Free speech ruling in the US –

”The evidence in our case is shocking and offensive, with senior federal officials deciding they could dictate what Americans can and cannot say on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and other platforms about COVID-19, elections, criticism of the government and more.”

– SWEDEN UNDER REVIEW 2023 07 05

HISTORIC DECISION 4 JULY 2023 IN USA, VERY IMPORTANT JUDGEMENT FOR FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

It is also not allowed to encourage or otherwise influence social media companies to change their policies on the removal, suppression or reduction of content containing free speech ….

”The evidence in our case is shocking and offensive, with senior federal officials deciding that they could dictate what Americans can and cannot say on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and other platforms about COVID-19, elections, criticism of the government and more.”
2023-07-04 IT’S HAPPENING IN THE USA, READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE AND SPREAD TO ALL TAXPAYERS, machine translation, quotes

Judge deals major blow to Biden admin in social media censorship case

A federal judge has made a historic decision by partially granting an injunction preventing various officials in the Biden administration and agencies such as the Justice Department and FBI from colluding with major tech companies to censor social media posts.

The injunction came in response to a censorship lawsuit filed by the attorneys general of Louisiana and Missouri, who have accused Biden administration officials and various government agencies of pressuring social media companies to suspend accounts or delete posts.

The judge, Terry A. Doughty, wrote in the 4 July ruling (pdf) that various government agencies, including the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the U.S. Department of State, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are prohibited from taking a variety of actions against social media companies.

In particular, the agencies and their employees are prohibited from meeting or contacting social media companies by phone, email, or text messages, or from ”in any way communicating with them and urging, encouraging, pressuring, or in any way causing them to remove, delete, suppress, or reduce content containing protected free speech,” according to the injunction.

Authorities are also prohibited from flagging content on posts on social media platforms and forwarding them to the companies with requests for action such as removing or otherwise suppressing their reach.

It is also not allowed to encourage or otherwise influence social media companies to change their policies for the removal, suppression or reduction of content containing free speech protected by the government.

The judge wrote in an attached memorandum that the plaintiffs ”are likely to succeed on the merits in establishing that the government has used its power to silence the opposition”.
”Opposition to COVID-19 vaccines; opposition to COVID-19 masking and lockdown; opposition to the COVID-19 laboratory leak theory; opposition to the validity of the 2020 election; opposition to President Biden’s policies; statements that Hunter Biden’s laptop story was true; and opposition to the policies of the government officials in power. All were suppressed,” Doughty wrote.
While the judge’s decision is not final, the preliminary injunction is a win for the Republican attorneys general who have accused the Biden administration of pressuring large tech companies to participate in censorship-by-proxy schemes.
”The evidence in our case is shocking and offensive, with senior federal officials deciding they could dictate what Americans can and cannot say on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and other platforms about COVID-19, elections, criticism of the government and more.”

READ MORE AND SPREAD TO ALL TAXPAYERS

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/missouri-v-biden-is-such-an-important